City’s position regarding SB 1069 (Wieckowski)

CF 15-0002-S189   Adopted to Refer,  13 – 0 – 2  Council referred item to Rules, Elections, Intergovernmental Relations and Neighborhoods Committee.

  • 08/31/2016 Council continued item to/for September 6, 2016
  • 08/23/2016 Council continued item to/for August 31, 2016
  • 08/18/2016 City Clerk scheduled item for Council on August 23, 2016
    08/18/2016 Rules, Elections, Intergovernmental Relations and Neighborhoods Committee waived consideration of item
  • 07/28/2016 Chief Legislative Analyst document(s) referred to Rules, Elections, Intergovernmental Relations and Neighborhoods Committee.
  • 07/27/2016 Document(s) submitted by Chief Legislative Analyst  (July 20,2016)

CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST and RESOLUTION (MARTINEZ – BUSCAINO) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding SB 1069 (Wieckowski), which would replace the term Second Unit with Accessory Dwelling Units, (ADU), and prescribes the maximum standards of an ADU.

Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:

ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2015-16 State Legislative Program OPPOSITION to SB 1069 (Wieckowski), which would replace the term Second Unit with Accessory Dwelling Units, (ADU), and prescribes that no parking standards shall be required for second dwelling units located half a mile of public transit, or located within architecturally and historically significant historic districts, thereby undermining local land use control and the concept of Home Rule by the imposition of State legislation on local government agencies, including charter cities.

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

(Rules, Elections, Intergovernmental Relations, and Neighborhoods Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email