Month: September 2017

by

City Council Referrals – September 27, 2017

17-1091
To Council (tentatively scheduled for October 3, 2017)
Motion (Huizar – Harris-Dawson) – Relative to funding to the Department of City Planning for additional analysis as it relates to the Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Nexus Study to be performed by BAE Urban Economics.

 

17-1108
To Planning and Land Use Management Committee
Motion (Harris-Dawson – Huizar – Cedillo)- Relative to instructing the Department of City Planning to review specific bills listed in the Motion to determine whether the City needs to adjust its business practices; determining any planning processes that could be eligible for State funding under SB 2; and reporting on the effectiveness of zones that allow for streamlined housing development.
by

SB 35 Planning and zoning: affordable housing: streamlined approval process.

Background
SB 35 (Weiner) “By Right” Approval Processing. This law streamlines the approval
process for infill developments in local communities that have failed to meet their regional housing needs.
a) Ministerial Approval Processing. The law authorizes a development proponent to submit an application for ministerial processing where a multifamily housing development satisfies specified planning objective standards and specified criteria. The law includes a long list of qualifying criteria, including payment of prevailing wages, use of a “skilled and trained workforce, and consistency with objective development standards. The law will apply only if it is shown in a housing production report (the first reports are due April 1, 2018) that a city is not achieving affordable housing targets. The law requires a local government to notify the development proponent in writing within 90 days of submittal (for projects of more than 150 units) if the local government determines that the development conflicts with any of those objective standards; otherwise, the development is deemed to comply with those standards. Design review or other public oversight of the development may still be conducted but is directed to the “objective and be strictly focused on assessing compliance with criteria required for streamlined projects, as well as reasonable objectives design standards published and adopted by ordinance or
resolution by a local jurisdiction before submission of a development application, and shall be broadly applicable to development within that jurisdiction.” The design review or public oversight process must be completed within 180 days (for projects of more than 150 units) of submittal of the development.
b) Limitations on Local Government Imposition of Parking or Other Requirements for Qualifying Projects. The law limits the authority of a local government to impose parking standards on a streamlined development approved. The law also prohibits a local government from adopting any requirement that applies to a project solely or partially on the basis that the project receives ministerial or streamlined approval pursuant to SB 35.
c) Limitations on Approval Expiration. The law provides that if a local government approves a project pursuant to that process, that approval will not expire if that project includes investment in housing affordability where more than 50 percent of units are affordable. The approval of a project that contains less than 50 percent affordable units expires automatically after three years, unless that project qualifies for a one-time, one-year extension of that approval. Separately, the law provides that an approval shall remain valid for three years from the date of the final action establishing that approval and shall remain valid thereafter so long as vertical construction of the development has begun and is in progress; it also authorizes a discretionary one-year extension.
d) Local Government Housing Production Reporting. The law also requires local
governments to include in the annual general plan report specified information regarding housing, including rental housing and for-sale housing that have been
issued a completed entitlement, building permit or certificate of occupancy. The law also  requires local governments to report on the housing produced pursuant to SB 35’s requirements.
Legislative Discussion 
California Senate Bill 35 (SB 35) is a statute streamlining housing construction in California counties and cities that fail to build enough housing to meet state-mandated housing construction requirements. The bill was introduced to the California State Assembly by State Senator Scott Wiener (D-SF) on December 15, 2016.SB 35 aims to address the California housing shortage by increasing the housing supply. The bill was signed into law on September 29, 2017, by Governor Jerry Brown as part of California’s 2017 Housing Package – a set of 15 bills that provide “an injection of new regulatory and financial resources” for cities.

Scott Wiener introduced SB 35 to increase the housing supply in cities that are not producing enough housing, by encouraging cities to either increase housing development on their own or be forced to accept housing development. After the bill’s passage, Wiener claimed: “SB 35 will retain local control for those cities that are producing their share of housing, but create a more streamlined path for housing creation in those cities that are blocking housing or ignoring their responsibility to build.”

SB 35 requires cities to include comprehensive rental market information in their biyearly housing element report and allows developers to submit an application subject to streamlined approval processes in municipalities not meeting Regional Housing Needs Assessments (RHNA).

The development must:  be on land zoned for residential use; designate at least 10% of units as below-market housing if located in localities that did not meet above moderate-income RHNA; designate at least 50% of units as below-market housing in localities that did not meet low-income RHNA; not be constructed in an ecologically protected area. multi-unit housing and not single-family homes; and pay construction workers union-level wages.

If the development meets all state-mandated criteria, localities must approve the project in either 60 days if the development contains less than 150 housing units or 90 days if the development contains more than 150 units of housing.

Cities will submit their housing construction progress to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) every 2 years. If the city fails to meet its RHNA goals at one of these progress checks, streamlining will be in effect for the entire next two-year cycle.SB 35 applies only to the specific income levels not being built for. For example, if a city is building enough market-rate units to meet its RHNA but not enough low-income units, the project can only add low-income units to qualify for quickened approval.

by

City Council Referrals – September 19, 2017

CF 17-1071       CD 2, 3, 4, 5, 14

Motion  09/19/2017

To Planning and Land Use Management Committee

Motion (Blumenfield – Krekorian – Ryu – Koretz – Huizar) – Instruct the Department of City Planning, with the assistance of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, City Administrative Officer, and Chief Legislative Analyst, to prepare a report in 60 days that identifies options for amending, supplementing, overlaying by neighborhood, or revising the Ventura-Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan.

by

City Council Referrals – September 21, 2017

CF 12-1824-S1

To Planning and Land Use Management Committee
To Public Safety Committee
City Attorney report R17-0325, relative to a draft ordinance adding section 41.58.1 to the Los Angeles Municipal Code to prohibit loud and unruly gatherings at residences in the City of Los Angeles.

Refer to  CF 12-1824-S1  for Detail

  • 09/21/2017 City Attorney document(s) referred to Planning and Land Use Management Committee; Public Safety Committee.  Council Action (11/04/2016), Report from Planning and Land Use Management Committee and Communication from Public Safety Committee
    (10/26/2016)
  • 09/20/2017 Document(s) submitted by City Attorney, as follows: Report from City Attorney  (09/20/2017), Attachment to Report dated 09/20/2017 – Draft Ordinance (09/20/2017)

City Attorney report R17-0325, relative to a draft ordinance adding section 41.58.1 to the Los Angeles Municipal Code to prohibit loud and unruly gatherings at residences in the City of Los Angeles.

by

Beverage and Entertainment Streamlined Program (BESt)

Dear All:

The Department continues to respond to the needs of its customers and make enhancements to its case processing operations. In an effort to improve processing turnaround times for entitlement cases submitted under the Beverage and Entertainment Streamlined Program (BESt), the Department is adding staffing resources to this program and making some procedural changes.

Effective immediately, the Expedited Processing Section will manage all stand-alone entitlements for alcohol sales and entertainment uses submitted as part of the BESt Program, working in conjunction with the Office of Zoning Administration to conduct public hearings and issue letters of determination.

The BESt Unit will continue to staff the Department’s Metro Development Service Center at 201 N. Figueroa to provide a variety of specialized customer services including pre-application review, case intake and condition clearance for the Department. The BESt fees associated with processing of stand-alone CUB and CUX cases will remain the same.

In 2016, the Department embarked on a major reorganization of its project planning operations to improve the overall functionality and quality of its services. Today’s changes build upon our present successes to date, realizing real improvements that continue to make a difference in the lives of individuals looking to invest or call Los Angeles home.

Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

All the best,
YLK

CitySeal.png

YEGHIG L. KESHISHIAN

Chief External Affairs Officer
Department of City Planning

T: (213) 978-1324 | M: (213) 408-2014

200 N. Spring St., Room 620A

Los Angeles, CA. 90012

FB-fLogo-2016-32x32.png   IG_Glyph_Fill-32x32.png   Twitter_Logo_White_On_Blue.png
by

Commercial Cannabis Activity

CPC-2017-2260-CA Council Districts: All     SATT DOES NOT ACTIVELY MONITOR THIS TOPIC

CEQA: ENV-2017-2261-ND; ENV-2017-3361-SE Last Day to Act: N/A

Plan Areas: All

PUBLIC HEARING – Completed June 29, 2017

PROJECT SITE: Citywide

PROPOSED PROJECT:  An amendment to the Los Angeles Municipal Code establishing location restrictions for commercial cannabis activity consistent with Measure M adopted by Los Angeles City voters on March 7, 2017.

REQUESTED ACTIONS:

1. Find, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including Negative Declaration No. ENV-2017-2261-ND (“Negative Declaration”), and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; 2. Determine that based on the whole of the administrative record, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Business and Professions Code Section 26055(h) on the basis that the project will adopt ordinances, rules and/or regulations, that will require discretionary review under CEQA to approve licenses to engage in commercial cannabis activity in the City of Los Angeles. 3. Recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance; 4. Adopt the staff report as the Commission’s report on the subject; and 5. Adopt the Findings.

Staff: Niall Huffman, City Planning Associate, niall.huffman@lacity.org, (213) 978-3405

by

City Planning Department – Exempt from Civil Service

CF 17-1055

COMMUNICATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING (DCP) relative to civil service exempt position requests, pursuant to Charter Section 1001 (d)(4).

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the action taken by the Board of Civil Service Commissioners on September 14, 2017, to exempt from civil service one Principal City Planner, one Public Information Director I, and one Public Relations Specialist II in the DCP to support the Metro Transit Oriented District Grant.

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

(Personnel and Animal Welfare Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

Adopted – FORTHWITH, (13); Absent: Bonin, Englander (2)

  • 09/20/2017 Council Vote: Adopted, Vote Given: (13 – 0 – 2)  (September 20, 2017), Report from  City Planning Department (September 14, 2017)
  • 09/20/2017 Council adopted item forthwith.  Report from  City Planning Department (September 14, 2017)
  • 09/14/2017 City Clerk scheduled item for Council on September 20, 2017 .  Report from  City Planning Department (September 14, 2017)
  • 09/14/2017 Personnel and Animal Welfare Committee waived consideration of item. Report from  City Planning Department (September 14, 2017)
  • 09/14/2017 Department of City Planning document(s) referred to Personnel and Animal Welfare Committee.  Report from  City Planning Department (September 14, 2017)
  • 09/14/2017 Document(s) submitted by Department of City Planning, as follows: Report from  City Planning Department (September 14, 2017)

Department of City Planning report, dated September 14, 2017, relative to a request for exemption of one Principal City Planner, one Public Information Director, and one Public Relations Specialist to support the Metro Transit Oriented District Grant.

by

Ms. Aura Garcia to the North Valley Area Planning Commission

CF 15-1409   AT  CITY COUNCIL 09/26/2017

PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the reappointment of Ms. Aura Garcia to the North Valley Area Planning Commission (NVAPC).
Recommendation for Council action:

RESOLVE that the Mayor’s reappointment of Ms. Aura Garcia to the NVAPC for the term ending June 30, 2022 is APPROVED and CONFIRMED. Ms. Garcia resides in Council District Seven. (Current Commission gender composition: F=1; M=4).

Financial Disclosure Statement: Pending.

 

 

  • 09/20/2017  City Clerk scheduled item for Council on September 26, 2017 .    Report from Planning and Land Use Management Committee
    (09/19/2017)
  • 09/19/2017  Planning and Land Use Management Committee approved item(s) . Report from Mayor  (08/14/2017)
  • 09/01/2017 City Clerk scheduled item for Council on September 26, 2017 .
  • 09/01/2017 Planning and Land Use Management Committee scheduled item for committee meeting on September 19, 2017.   Report from Mayor (August 14, 2017)
  • 08/15/2017 Mayor document(s) referred to Planning and Land Use Management Committee.  Report from Mayor (August 14, 2017)
  • 08/14/2017 Document(s) submitted by Mayor, as follows:  Report from Mayor (August 14, 2017)

Mayor report, dated August 14, 2017, relative to the reappointment of Aura Garcia to the North Valley Area Planning Commission for the term ending June 30, 2022. Ms. Garcia’s current term expired on June 30, 2017.

 

 

by

City Council Referrals – September 14, 2017

17-1053
CD 8, 9, 14, 15
To Planning and Land Use Management Committee
Los Angeles City Planning Commission report, dated September 5, 2017, relative to an update to the Southeast Los Angeles Community Plan.

 

17-1054
CD 1, 8, 9, 10, 15
To Planning and Land Use Management Committee
Los Angeles City Planning Commission report, dated September 5, 2017, relative to an update to the South Los Angeles Community Plan.

 

17-1055
To Personnel and Animal Welfare Committee
Department of City Planning report, dated September 14, 2017, relative to a request for exemption of one Principal City Planner, one Public Information Director, and one Public Relations Specialist.
by

Proposed Process Overhaul Released – City Planning Standardizes Project Review

The following was obtained from  ReCode website

City Planning Meeting Schedule 

Today, the re:code LA team of City Planning unveiled a proposal that will cut the number of project review processes in half. This new set of processes & procedures will maintain long-standing opportunities for public participation, and make it easier for both applicants and the public to clearly understand how the Department considers use and development proposals and how to navigate the decision-making process.

Currently, there are over 100 different paths for project review scattered throughout the Zoning Code. For example, there are four types of adjustments for projects covered by overlays – an additional layer of design and building standards. While the same process applies for all four types of adjustments, they have different names and are located in different sections of the Zoning Code. The team identified each instance of redundant workflows and consolidated them down to about 50 processes with unique actions. We have prepared a comparison table of the proposed and existing processes to help illustrate how each is related.

The proposed changes result in a more consistent and standardized set of processes & procedures. To help users navigate the Code, this proposal includes new sections to outline the administration of the Code and authorities by decision-maker, provide a process summary table by planning entitlement, and describe actions requiring multiple approvals.

The new processes and procedures will be the second major part of a larger effort to update the City’s Zoning Code; the first part was the new R1 Variation Zones that went into effect in March 2017. The proposal will lay the groundwork for a more user-friendly set of guidelines. As a part of the proposed action, the new administrative provisions will go into a new Chapter 1A of the Municipal Code and will apply to both the existing Zoning Code (Chapter 1 of the Municipal Code) and the new one when it goes into effect. Chapter 1A will eventually serve as the only Zoning Code for the City of Los Angeles; however, it will be adopted in phases, intended to replace the content of Chapter 1 over time, and implementing the policies of Community Plans as they are adopted.

Pending Council adoption, the City will have in place a new, consistent format for the review of planning projects. Whether a homeowner is looking to apply for a fence height adjustment or a developer is interested in obtaining a conditional use permit for a hotel project, these updated processes & procedures add greater clarity to planning considerations.

“Anyone – regardless of their level of understanding – will now be able to pick up our Zoning Code and navigate from one section to the next. These changes are fundamentally about making our work more accessible and relatable to Angelenos.”
– Vince Bertoni, Director of the Department of City Planning

Join us online or in person and let us know what you think!

The proposed processes & procedures are posted on our project website’s MarkUp system and will be available for direct commenting from now until September 30, 2017. MarkUp lets you browse, download, and comment on draft documents, and provides a great opportunity to directly shape re:code LA. If this is your first time using MarkUp, we’ve prepared a quick walk-through on how it works.

City Planning will hold a series of open houses and public hearings in September to gather feedback on the proposal, after which time a revised recommendation will be considered by the City Planning Commission and City Council for approval. Below is the list of open houses and public hearings:

 

Open House & Public Hearing #1

LOCATION:
City Hall, Room 1050,
200 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles

DATE: Tuesday, September 19, 2017

TIME: 10:00 am – 12:00 pm

 

Open House & Public Hearing #2

LOCATION:
Felicia Mahood Multipurpose Center, Community Room
11338 Santa Monica Blvd, Los Angeles

DATE: Tuesday, September 19, 2017

TIME: 6:00 pm – 8:00 pm

 

Open House & Public Hearing #3

LOCATION:
Marvin Braude Constituent Service Center, Community Rooms 1a & 1b
6262 Van Nuys Blvd, Los Angeles

DATE: Wednesday, September 20, 2017

TIME: 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm

 

Open House & Public Hearing #4

LOCATION:
Constituent Service Center, Community Conference Room
8475 S. Vermont Ave, Los Angeles

DATE: Thursday, September 21, 2017

TIME: 5:00 pm – 7:00 pm

 

For more details on these meetings, please refer to the Public Hearing Notice.

re:code LA is a comprehensive revision of the City of Los Angeles’ Zoning Code, and is one of the City’s largest planning initiatives to date. First adopted in 1946, the Zoning Code’s overall structure has remained the same, while the needs of the City have changed drastically. The project will create a Zoning Code that provides a whole new set of land use and development regulations that realize the needs of a 21st Century Los Angeles for all stakeholders.

by

City Planning Commission

AT CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 09/14/07

RECONSIDERATIONS

5a. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a Commission Action on any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the Commission Rule 8.3, provided the Commission retains jurisdiction over the matter.

5b. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a majority of the Commission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action, the Commission may address the merits of the original Commission Action.

by

City Planning Releases Proposed Permanent Supportive Housing Ordinance

Full Report:  August 31, 2017

Los Angeles – Today, City Planning released its draft Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH)
Ordinance as part of the City’s Comprehensive Homeless Strategy.

According to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), the number of individuals who are homeless in the City has grown by 20% since 2016. Today, of the estimated 34,189 homeless individuals, 25,237 – or nearly seventy-four percent of the homeless population – are currently unsheltered.

In order to move homeless individuals off the street and into PSH, the Los Angeles electorate voted overwhelmingly last fall in support of Measure HHH – a $1.2B local bond that would further the construction of new housing units for the City’s most vulnerable population.

City Planning has now prepared a proposed ordinance to streamline PSH projects. If adopted, this ordinance will better ensure that the City is a responsible steward of these funds, providing a streamlined pathway for the consideration of PSH projects while also imposing new regulations which establish stronger development standards for qualifying projects.  …   (See full report)

by

Cannabis Ordinances – Archive – Previous Draft June 08, 2017

SATT DOES NOT ACTIVELY MONITOR THIS TOPIC

Ordinance Information

Additional Information

 Maps

 

 

 

by

North Valley Area Planning Commission – September 7, 2017

RECONSIDERATIONS

a. MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER – The Commission may make a motion to reconsider a
Commission Action on any agenda items from its previous meeting, consistently with the
Commission Rule 8.3, provided the Commission retains jurisdiction over the matter.

b. MERITS OF ANY ITEM THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED TO RECONSIDER – If a
majority of the Commission has approved a motion to reconsider a Commission Action,
the Commission may address the merits of the original Commission Action.

by

City Planning Releases Proposed Permanent Supportive Housing Ordinance

Press Release August 31, 2017 

Los Angeles – Today, City Planning released its draft Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH)  Ordinance as part of the City’s Comprehensive Homeless Strategy.

According to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), the number of individuals who are homeless in the City has grown by 20% since 2016. Today, of the estimated 34,189  homeless individuals, 25,237 – or nearly seventy-four percent of the homeless population – are  currently unsheltered.

In order to move homeless individuals off the street and into PSH, the Los Angeles electorate  voted overwhelmingly last fall in support of Measure HHH – a $1.2B local bond that would further  the construction of new housing units for the City’s most vulnerable population.

City Planning has now prepared a proposed ordinance to streamline PSH projects. If adopted, this  ordinance will better ensure that the City is a  responsible steward of these funds, providing a  streamlined pathway for the consideration of PSH projects while also imposing new regulations   which establish stronger development standards for qualifying projects.   ….   Refer to Press Release August 31, 2017 

by

Open Space Working Group

From April through June 2017, the Department of City Planning convened four meetings of an Open Space Working Group for OurLA2040, the City’s update to the General Plan. The Department of City Planning has released a summary explaining the working group process, and its relationship to OurLA2040’s forthcoming community engagement and plan development phases. For more information, please visit www.ourla2040.org.

by

Zone Change to Remove Studio City Residential RFA

CPC–2017-2342-ZC ENV-2015-4197-ND-REC1

Planning Department Info

What is the purpose of the Studio City Residential Floor Area (RFA) Supplemental
Use District (SUD)?

In 2008, the City Council adopted the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (BMO) to
address the proliferation of out-of-scale single-family developments in the City’s single
family neighborhoods. To preserve characteristics of individual single family
neighborhoods, BMO included a Residential Floor Area (RFA) Supplemental Use District
(SUD) process that tailored development standards and Floor Area Ratio (FAR) that best
complemented the size and character of its neighborhoods. In a motion, dated
September 5, 2008 Council directed the Department of City Planning to initiate an RFA
SUD for Studio City. http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2008/08-2332_mot_9-5-08.pdf

In 2012, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 182048 establishing the Studio City RFA
SUD for all single family zones in non-hillside areas for the purposes of reducing impacts
to surrounding homes while preserving neighborhood character. The Studio City RFA
SUD regulations can be found here: http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2008/08-
2332_ord_182048.pdf.

The Studio City RFA SUD set a residential floor area maximum and created a menu of
nine bonus options which increases the allowable FAR in exchange for desirable design
and environmental features.

by

Chatsworth-Northridge Industrial Core, Innov818,

CF 17-0938

CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (ENGLANDER – KREKORIAN) relative to the proposed designation of the Chatsworth-Northridge Industrial Core, Innov818, located in Council District 12.

Recommendation for Council action:

INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to report back with recommendations to define and designate a Chatsworth-Northridge Industrial Core, Innov818, in the area generally bounded by the following geographical boundaries: Topanga Canyon Boulevard on the west; Lassen Street on the north (between Topanga Canyon Boulevard and Mason Avenue); Mason Avenue on the east (between Lassen Street and Plummer Street); Plummer Street east bound to Corbin Avenue (between Mason Avenue and Corbin Avenue); Corbin Avenue on the east (between Plummer Street and Nordhoff Street); and Nordhoff Street on the south (between Topanga Canyon Boulevard and Corbin Avenue).

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

(Planning and Land Use Management Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

  • 09/06/2017 Council Action. Vote Action: Question to Substitute Vote Given: (15 – 0 – 0)   (September 6, 2017), Substitute Ordinance (September 5, 2017)
  • 09/05/2017  Council adopted substitute motion, subject to reconsideration, pursuant to Council Rule 51.   Substitute Ordinance (September 5, 2017)
  • 08/31/2017  City Clerk scheduled item for Council on September 5, 2017 . Motion ( August 18, 2017)
  • 08/31/2017 City Clerk scheduled item for Council on September 5, 2017 .  Motion ( August 18, 2017)
  • 08/29/2017 Planning and Land Use Management Committee waived consideration of item . Motion ( August 18, 2017)
  • 08/18/2017 Motion document(s) referred to Planning and Land Use Management Committee.  Motion ( August 18, 2017)
by

Mr. Vahid Khorsand to the Los Angeles City Planning Commission

CF 17-0837

PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the appointment of Mr. Vahid Khorsand to the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC).

Recommendation for Council action:

RESOLVE that the Mayor’s appointment of Mr. Vahid Khorsand to the LACPC for the term ending June 30, 2022 is APPROVED and CONFIRMED. Mr. Khorsand resides in Council District Five. (Current Commission gender composition: F=4; M=5).

Financial Disclosure Statement: Filed.

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

  • 09/06/2017 Council Action.  (September 6, 2016)  Vote Given: (12 – 0 – 3), PLUM Report (August 29, 2017)
  • 09/05/2017 Council adopted item, subject to reconsideration, pursuant to Council Rule 51.  PLUM Report (August 29, 2017)
  • 08/31/2017 City Clerk scheduled item for Council on September 5, 2017 . PLUM Report (August 29, 2017)
  • 08/25/2017 Planning and Land Use Management Committee scheduled item for committee meeting on August 29, 2017. (August 3, 2017), Report from Mayor (July 7, 2017)
  • 08/04/2017 City Ethics Commission document(s) referred to Planning and Land Use Management Committee. (August 3, 2017)
  • 08/03/2017 Document(s) submitted by City Ethics Commission, as follows: Report from City Ethic Commission (August 3, 2017)

City Ethics Commission report, dated August 3, 2017, relative to the pre-confirmation financial disclosure statement of Vahid Khorsand.

  • 07/28/2017 Mayor document(s) referred to Planning and Land Use Management Committee. Report from Mayor (July 7, 2017)
  • 07/27/2017 Document(s) submitted by Mayor, as follows:Report from Mayor (July 7, 2017)

Mayor report, dated July 27, 2017, relative to the appointment of Vahid Khorsand to the City Planning Commission for the term ending June 30, 2022. Mr. Khorsand will fill the vacancy created by Richard Katz, whose term has expired.

 

by

City Council Referral – August 25, 2017

17-0981
To Ad Hoc on Comprehensive Job Creation Plan Committee
Motion (Krekorian – Blumenfield) – Relative to the Department of City Planning, with assistance of the City Attorney and Los Angeles Police Department, to report on recommendations for creating the ability to issue over the counter on-site alcohol Conditional Use Permits provided businesses meet the proposed standard conditions attached to the Motion.