CF 15-0002-S188 at City Council Adopted to Refer, Unanimous Vote (13); Absent: Bonin, Fuentes (2)
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST and RESOLUTION (MARTINEZ – BUSCAINO) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding AB 2299 (Bloom), which would require local agencies to provide by ordinance the creation of second dwelling units.
- 07/11/2017 Council re-referred item to Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee, pursuant to Council Action of July 1, 2017, Council File No. 17-0769.
- 09/07/2016 Council Action (September , 2016), Chief Legislative Analyst (July 20, 2016), Resolution (June 7, 2016)
- 09/06/2016 Council referred item to Rules, Elections, Intergovernmental Relations and Neighborhoods Committee
- 08/31/2016 Council continued item to/for September 6, 2016
- 08/23/2016 Council continued item to/for August 31, 2016.
- Chief Legislative Analyst (July 20, 2016)
- City Council Action Sept. 6, 2016 – REFERRED TO THE RULES, ELECTIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE
Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2015-16 State Legislative Program OPPOSITION to AB 2299 (Bloom), which would require local agencies, including charter cities, to provide by ordinance for the creation of second dwelling units in single family and multifamily residential zones, and would prohibit cities from imposing parking requirements, and thereby undermine local land use control, the concept of Home Rule, and potentially causing parking spillover impacts on nearby homes and businesses.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
(Rules, Elections, Intergovernmental Relations, and Neighborhoods Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(Continued from Council meeting of August 31, 2016)
